Discernment is rare in an era of abundant information.
Every day, articles come across our screens that seem polished, intellectual, or even journalistic, but not all content is created equal.
And not all motives are transparent.
Case in point: a recent article claiming Donald Trump is “the furthest thing from a fascist” in the Atlantic (the articule circulated under a seemingly reputable banner, with academic references and historic parallels. But a closer look revealed it was published on RT (Russia Today), a state-funded outlet known for pushing Kremlin-aligned narratives. The byline, tone, and structure mimicked a think-piece or op-ed you’d expect in mainstream Western media, but the goal wasn’t informed discourse. It was ideological persuasion.
So, how do you, as a reader, keep your eyes wide open?
1. Check the Source
Is the platform independent or state-affiliated? Is it known for editorial integrity, or does it have a history of disinformation?
-
RT, for instance, is considered a propaganda arm of the Russian government. That doesn’t mean everything it publishes is false—but it does mean you should read with heightened skepticism.
2. Scrutinize the Language
Does the article rely on emotional triggers, loaded language, or buzzwords like “woke,” “elites,” or “mainstream media”? Does it position itself as the lone voice of truth against a corrupt majority?
-
Propaganda thrives on simplicity and blame.
3. Follow the Footnotes
Are historical references used in good faith or cherry-picked to fit a narrative? Are quotes from legitimate sources or fringe voices given undue weight?
-
Many articles use real scholars like György Lukács or Gore Vidal out of context to lend credibility to shaky claims.
4. Interrogate the Argument Structure
Is the author trying to inform, persuade, or provoke? Does the piece encourage critical thought or demand ideological loyalty?
-
A trustworthy article leaves room for nuance, not just affirmation of a worldview.
5. Ask What’s Missing
What’s not being said? Are voices from marginalized groups absent? Are complex issues oversimplified?
-
Omissions can be as manipulative as distortions.
6. Cross-Reference
Look for other reputable sources covering the same topic. Are the facts consistent across outlets? Are any major points being disputed by credible experts?
The Bigger Picture
We are in a time when authoritarian ideologies don new outfits: populism, technocracy, nationalism, even pseudo-intellectualism. They dress up their messages in respectable clothing to court legitimacy.
That’s why it’s not enough to consume content. We must learn to read it.
Read with curiosity. Read with caution. Read with context.
Because in a world full of spin, your greatest weapon is a well-trained eye.
Leave a Comment